On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Gregg Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/12/2013 11:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Steffen <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>**> wrote: >> >> Ok. >> >> >> Thanks for looking, guys. >> >> IIUC the Windows build is commit-then-review, so I'll commit the similar >> 2.4 changes to BaseAddr.ref based on a 64-bit debug build with Visual >> Studio 2012 tools. >> >> No, the only thing in 2.4 I know of that is CTR is mod_lua, as for > anything else, if I thought it was CTR I'd have backported my r1505178 at > that time.
whoops... (I just added an entry in 2.4.x STATUS to try to list exceptions to RTC; maybe folks will speak up and get the exception list complete/correct in the short term) > That said however, I do not see this as hurting as we have time to fix it > if a problem is found before the next tag. I'll run both release & debug > builds myself this weekend and look though the output. One never knows if > there is a difference between your cmake and my way of building the beast :) > > Regards, > > Gregg > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
