Re: uds support

[Jim Jagielski]

One thing about "lumping" both the UDS path *and* the
actual URL into the name field is that it really limits
the size of both, such that, long term, I think it will
come back and bite us. Since last night I've been working
on a plan to simply create a new field for the path,
which gives us a lot more breathing room and places
less restrictions on URL and pathname length.