That's why I chose what I did... It's only needed once and the pool is around. But yeah, it may be better.
On Oct 17, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > This is uglier than creating a subpool... :) > > Possibly ;) but with the pool being destroyed then... > > Regards. >
