On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it intended to call ap_get_brigade() a second time when the EOS is there > the first time? > The second call is likely to return APR_EOF which is quite different than > EOS brigade...
It does seem fishy, probably copied from the earlier he blocks where ap_get_brigade was not called at all before removing the filter to step aside. There does seem to be a zero-byte deflated response in the test framework and it passes w/o the extra call. W -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
