+1 Regards
Rüdiger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 13:01 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Question on APLOGNO assignment, 2.4 vs trunk > > +1. > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > On 12 Nov 2013, at 11:41 PM, "William A. Rowe Jr." > wrote: > > > >> Trying to apply > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message- > tags/next-number?r1=1527925&r2=1527924&pathrev=1527925 > >> ... there is no next-number tracking. > >> > >> How are we tracking numbers on 2.4 vs. trunk, and avoiding some > >> discordance between the next 2.6 and 2.4 error numbers? Using > >> trunk number allocations on any-branch? > >> > >> If we create a 2.4 branch-specific error for some cause, do we > >> simply tick the trunk counter? > > > > I think this is the most pragmatic approach, the numbers only need to > be unique, and keeping the counter in one place makes sure we always > stay that way. > > > > Regards, > > Graham > > -- > >
