On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2013, at 2:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It doesn't look like one to me... :/ > > One thing it does is make the return codes more targeted. Where previously > any kind of failure would have returned 500 Internal Server Error[1] now we > might return more specific codes based on the APR code returned. External > code should remain unaffected. > > The question becomes is a subtle change to some return codes backportable or > not? > Well, we do, at times, adjust return codes to return the "right" one (or the "better" one), during point/patch releases... But I'm not really pushing one way or another (yet) on this...
