I can think or see anything in the actual request handling aspect that's any different from the original proposal, certainly nothing that would result in any sort of performance issue.
What MPM? Have you tried w/ 2.4.6? On Nov 18, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > And... this is a bit discouraging, but as a comparison to the older UDS > patch.... > 2.4.6 + original UDS patch: > Requests/sec: 5347.17 > Requests/sec: 5102.16 > Requests/sec: 5074.15 > > This is a sizable difference... Note that the current 2.4 backport > proposal was applied to 2.4.6 since that is what I tested the original > patch with (to keep everything apples to apples). > > I'll jump in to take a look at this when time is available (next week?) > but would like to fish for any immediate thoughts in the mean time. > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > On 11/18/2013 1:11 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Oops - I copypasta'd the per-thread stats. Total stats for the test follow: >> httpd: >> Requests/sec: 4633.17 >> Requests/sec: 4664.49 >> Requests/sec: 4657.63 >> >> nginx: >> Requests/sec: 5701.16 >> Requests/sec: 5798.08 >> Requests/sec: 5584.60 >
