Note, the only think changed in event now (via https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1542560) is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for event... if the check fails, it means that event has been "broken" on that system, assuming it ever hit blocked idlers, for a *long* time.
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.7 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.7 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. > > [X] +1: Good to go > > Linux RHEL5-ish: > > httpd 2.4.7+apr-1.5.0+apr-util-1.5.3+mod_perl httpd24threading branch > (current)+latest libxml2/pcre/zlib/other modules > **but no mod_ssl** > > passes httpd test suite > passes the same mod_perl tests that passed with httpd 2.4.6 > > I forgot to try this with icc at the time :( Event no longer works with > httpd and apr built with icc. (See r1410459 commit thread.) More digging on > my part is needed to find out which atomic code gets used. > > > Win2008 R2: > > same combination of code > Visual Studio 2012 64-bit (cmake "NMake Makefiles" generator) > > passes the same httpd tests that passed with 2.4.6 (running all testcases > cleanly on Windows is not currently possible) > not able to try mod_perl test suite in this environment currently > > > > > -- > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > http://emptyhammock.com/
