On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the mod_perl crash with Event that I posted at the URL below, I would > > suspect that there's some affinity with the original worker thread. Can > > anyone in mod_perl land confirm? > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/perl-dev/201311.mbox/%3CCAKUrXK6C3R_F3NdA%2BJUGYOqppvnoQJLTGQ9%2BA916vuMb0g9dig%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > I'm also aware of a third-party diagnostic module that could use a hint, > and > > in general I wonder if anyone knows of specific interface requirements > that > > would need to be provided by a new hook for indicating when a connection > or > > request leaves the original thread or is handled by a new one. > > I can't see any need for more than request_rec on both ends. > As it turns out (or, why didn't I refresh my understanding before), the MPM only knows about the conn_rec. * It could do extra work to learn about the request in order to pass the request to the new hook. * It could avoid that extra work for configurations that don't have a module that implements the hook. I'm leaning towards not having the MPM bother with any of that. Such magic is well within the scope of a module that cares about detaching from the thread anyway. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
