On 01/12/2013 11:16, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 30.11.2013 12:54, Graham Leggett wrote: >> A question out of ignorance on my side. Will/can the above directive >> be able to influence / somehow affect the ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string() >> openssl call needed when using dynamic engines in openssl (the >> "engine -pre" and "-post" options specifically)? > > Steve is probably the best person to answer this, but in my view, > SSLOpenSSLConfCmd is meant to expose the SSL_CONF API, and should not be > used to mix in ENGINE API things, too. >
Well at present there is no ENGINE interface for SSL_CONF. As pointed out it isn't a good fit for general ENGINE configuration but it could be updated in future to support ENGINE based private keys. Steve. -- Dr Stephen Henson. OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. 1829 Mount Ephraim Road Adamstown, MD 21710 +1 877-673-6775 [email protected]
