Yeah, I'm not looking at the patch itself, just if the use cases are correct and important enough to work the issue.
On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> So I'm guessing that the use-cases described in >> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54616 >> >> are bogus? >> >> I'm no pro nor con the change, just trying to understand >> if such a change has merit. > > I think the use cases are legit, like per-directory RewriteRule with > the P flag [to AF_UNIX workers] > > The patch in the PR seems to be something needed for an early AF_UNIX > patch with rewrite escaping, but it does not at first blush look very > safe. >
