Agreed. Thx for seeing those patches and proposing them being added! On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is why I am trying to fold the patches back in. There is a definite > difference between open source and a real community. =) -- justin > > On Dec 29, 2013 10:17 AM, "Jim Jagielski" <[email protected]> wrote: > It is for reasons like this that I tend to dislike Github, > simply because it creates this mentality... > > What mentality you may say? The mentality to work separate > from the community. I am sure that there are useful things > in this repo, but instead of working w/ us, and making > us aware of them, they instead just spin out something > separate. Why? > > IMO, this tendency to "do your own thing" is one reason > why BSD failed while Linux succeeded... The result is > a *more* fragmented community, not a more cohesive and > collaborative one. > > On Dec 27, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > There are two patches that the Ceph community has applied to their httpd > > packages in combination with radosgw (S3 endpoint) - (see > > https://github.com/ceph/apache2). > > > > One of them is to allow Content-Length of '0' to be emitted from HEAD > > requests: > > > > https://github.com/ceph/apache2/commit/0d9948f1e483386adef0841896484db8422127b2 > > > > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of > > radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD > > requests - IOW, they don't infer the lack of a Content-Length as being '0'. > > If we weren't comfortable allowing this as a default, I'm guessing that we > > could expose this as a directive override. > > > > The other patch is to relax some of the checks around Expect headers as not > > all S3 clients emit compliant headers: > > > > https://github.com/ceph/apache2/commit/5ae1b4a081b05fcacf55e7114eec87d9b2a0a5da > > > > Again, I guess that we could apply a directive here to relax the check. > > > > If we go the directive route, both are relatively easy to whip up patches > > for, but I wanted to get some feedback before I commit anything to trunk. > > > > Cheers. -- justin >
