+1

in some cases re-consider if a used option is really needed
and disable it may close a vulnerability, the admin only
needs to know that there is danger

Am 10.01.2014 15:24, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> +1
> On Jan 10, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> [X] It is mandatory to provide best available description and any available 
>> tracking information when committing fixes for vulnerabilities to any 
>> branch, delaying committing of the fix if the information shouldn't be 
>> provided yet.
>>
>> --/--
>>
>> IMO it is not appropriate to let skilled attackers see a code change (which 
>> they can analyze to determine if there is an impact that they can exploit) 
>> if you are not going to make it possible for the general user community 
>> looking at the same commit activity to decide if they need to take an action.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to