> It just woke up - committed in r1560977 and proposed for backport to v2.4.x.
Nice, thank you ! > Isn't it curious how the expiry is inspected before the session is decoded? Why ? On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Erik Pearson <e...@adaptations.com> wrote: > Isn't it curious how the expiry is inspected before the session is decoded? > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > >> On 16 Jan 2014, at 5:15 PM, Thomas Eckert <thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I've had this deployed for some time now and it works just fine. Did >> this just fall asleep or is further explanation desired ? >> >> It just woke up - committed in r1560977 and proposed for backport to >> v2.4.x. >> >> Regards, >> Graham >> -- >> >> > > > -- > Erik Pearson > Adaptations > ;; web form and function >
