I guess the easiest one in this case is to create a new one. Regards
Rüdiger From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 14:25 To: httpd Subject: Re: PR 50335 missing patch? On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Go ahead and commit it. We can update the backport proposal for 2.2.x afterwards and propose it as a new one to 2.4.x. Commited to trunk and backport proposed to 2.4.x. For 2.2.x I'm not sure how to proceed since there is already 3 votes (including mine) for the two first patches. Should I simply add the third patch in the same entry (which I guess would invalidate the existing votes) or create a new entry like in 2.4.x? Regards Rüdiger From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 12:36 To: httpd Subject: PR 50335 missing patch? Hi, the patch proposed by Rüdiger at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335#c30 has not been commited in trunk (nor backported...). Shouldn't it to fully address the issue? It seems that the error path is concerned too (since conn->scpool is still destroyed before r->pool). Regards; Yann.
