On 12 Mar 2014, at 12:37 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
> cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
> gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
> will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be proposed
> which either (1) removes r1573360 or (2) fixes this bug.

+1.

Regards,
Graham
--

Reply via email to