On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Probably 2.4.8/STATUS should be fixed too. > > > no, we wouldn't retag the file, and we wouldn't regenerate the tarballs of > the same version to fix anything; if there's a truly hot issue to resolve in > a tagged version we'll bump the version and create a new tarball ("version > numbers are cheap" as the saying goes)
Thanks for clarification, I wasn't sure at all, especially as STATUS is not part of the tarball. Just wanted to point out the copy of the typo within the 2.4.8 tag.
