Oh, didn't mean to vote -1, just wanted to add a note on the stuff being worked that could be integrated in the backport. I can make another proposal anyway, sorry for the noise. Corrected in r1587758.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2014, at 1:51 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> @@ -136,6 +179,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> 2.4.x patch: trunk works >> http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/uds-rewrite.patch >> +1: jim, humbedooh >> + -1: ylavic: still being worked on, see issues here in the following >> thread >> + >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg59276.html >> > > I can't recall... isn't the issue still being worked an > additional aspect of mod_rewrite and UDS; that is, a new > behavior to be added (or handled) rather than a "broken" > behavior. >
