On 17 Jun 2014, at 14:24, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > On 06/17/2014 05:19 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 12:46 AM, Tim Bannister wrote: >>> On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:23, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >> In addition, I have some comments about your design proposal: >> >> - The apache.org design might be changing RSN (it's being discussed), so >> using it might not be the most optimal route. > There is no requirement that a project site look like the main foundation > site. Pick any project. Say, http://flume.apache.org/ or > http://cloudstack.apache.org/ or http://etch.apache.org/ - each has their own > unique feel.
If I could, I'd have httpd and Tomcat use the same site structure. There two projects are complements / substitutes, and users don't particularly like learning a new site layout for each thing. Tomcat has the same sort of problem with having multiple versions that are out there in production use, too. …I'm saying this even though I don't have the time or the contacts to liaise with the Tomcat web people properly. >> - You use JavaScript to display the tabs. This, apparently, needs to be >> done in a way that people without JS can view it as well. I have tried >> to accommodate that in my second proposal (see link above). >> - The documentation link just leads to our boring and unattractive docs >> front page. I would prefer if people can go directly to documentation >> for e.g. 2.4 right away from the front page (dropdowns?). > > Yes, please. “+1” to this. -- Tim Bannister - +44 7980408788 - is...@jellybaby.net
