On 09/18/2013 02:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1!
On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Jan Kaluža <jkal...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/22/2013 08:02 AM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
----- Original Message -----
Hello Jan,
Is there any reason we shouldn't do this in trunk?
I don't see any reason. This patch was intended for trunk, but I don't
have
svn commit access, so I'm sending patches to this list :). It's also
better
that someone reviews my code, because I don't have so long experience with
httpd development.
If there's nobody against this change, I will commit the first two patches
(+ documentation) to trunk in the end of the week. I think we should wait
with mod_journald a bit until journald's performance gets better, but if you
think it would be useful to have mod_journald in trunk too, let me know.
+1, and I don't think mod_journald would hurt.
Hi,
I've updated mod_journald to latest trunk and added documentation. You
can check the patch against trunk at
<http://people.apache.org/~jkaluza/patches/mod_journald/0001-mod_journald.patch>.
I'm going to commit it to trunk next week.
Regards,
Jan Kaluza
