On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Takashi Sato <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> - rv = errno; > > > > > > rv still needs to get set to something non-zero as part of reporting > failure > > to the caller; EPERM perhaps, or APR_EGENERAL? > > > You are right. > I think EPERM is better. At least chroot(2) and chown（２） returns it. > +1 -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
