On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I presume the 3 +1's were sufficient? There was some discussion > around the change hitting 2.2 before 2.4, so I wanted to be sure we > had the right patch on the actively maintained release branch, at > least in svn.
No issues, I just misremembered the status
