On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:27 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: > Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older svn on Windows > which would no longer handshake with svn.apache.org and bumped into > a single issue. > > Building VC6 binaries for win32, I was bitten by r1508904 which > introduces > a C99 type prior to releasing apr 2.0 (probably not a good idea to > make > such changes in a maintenance branch).
I don't mean to tangent this discussion too much but I'm curious. So this change back in 2.2.26(?) was what finally made me start to use visual studio 2010 for our windows builds (and boy is that an ugly mess). Is there a reason why you're sticking with VC6 to build? I was surprised that this change made it into a maintenance branch, but honestly was looking for something to push me to building on VC2010. Thanks, Andy
