Cool.
On Sep 12, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Martynas Bendorius <[email protected]> wrote:

> Super! I've tested it and it solves all the problems with mod_status. Thank 
> you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Martynas Bendorius
> 
> On 9/12/14 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Fixed in:
>> 
>>     http://svn.apache.org/r1624349
>> 
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, fixing this *specifically* for mod_status is
>>> easy, but, as you say, the problem is more systemic
>>> than that.
>>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>>> --------- Original Message ---------
>>>> Subject: Re: mod_status: Apache 2.4 incorrect IP (proxy, not useragent_ip) 
>>>> on server-status page
>>>> From: "Jim Jagielski" <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: 9/11/14 10:45 am
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> Ugg. Yeah; we should actually have a complimentary version
>>>> that takes request_req as the param, not conn_rec.
>>>> 
>>>> ap_get_remote_host_r()??
>>>> 
>>>> Considered that.  But that still breaks mod_remoteip's advertised
>>>> behavior against third party modules until they adapt.  So I'd written
>>>> this off as a non-starter :(
>>>> 
>>>> Ugly.
>>>> 
>>>> Indeed
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to