On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available >> in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet? >> > > Hi, > > I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with the > changes adding socket activation), but for mod_journald, we would have to > backport "modular logging", which breaks the API/ABI and therefore I'm > afraid that won't happen in 2.4 branch :(. > > I have an old patch somewhere that doesn't break the API/ABI, and accommodates such differences as syslog being built-in in 2.4.x. I didn't realize that anybody besides me actually cared. I'll try to find time to see how it fits in 2.4.x-HEAD. > Jan Kaluza > > > As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default >> (CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them >> are going to use systemd by default (Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu), it >> requires manual patching of apache for the support of systemd/journald. >> >> Thank you! >> >> > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
