Ok, I will send them in the morning. Thanks, Yingqi
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:53 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > All of them are needed. > > Regards > > Rüdiger > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:12 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: RE: Time for 2.4.11 >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> I just checked and found the most recent commits regarding to >> "SO_REUSEPORT" patch work is done on Dec 4, 2014 with trunk version >> 1643179. There are also other commits done on this patch work as well. >> Please let me know if you need commits ID from all of them or the most >> recent one is good enough. I can help you find if you want. >> >> Thanks, >> Yingqi >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:35 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11 >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Thanks very much for your replies. I do not think there is a 2.4 >> backport patch available. All my previous work are on top of the trunk >> version. However, I think you may be able to apply the svn commits on >> 2.4 since the work is pretty much self-contained. >> >> Please let me know if that works for you. >> >> Thanks, >> Yingqi Lu >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:07 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11 >> >> I haven't had time to check... is there an actual 2.4 backport patch >> available, or do I need to craft one (or do the svn commits apply >> cleanly)?? >>> On Jan 14, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I just want to check what the status on the "SO_REUSEPORT" patch is. >> Do you see any issues backport it? Please let me know. >>> >>> Attached is the email I sent last week on the same topic in case you >> missed that. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yingqi >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:54 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11 >>> >>> Get your backports into STATUS now, and test and vote on the existing >> (and to-be-entered) proposals asap! >>> >>>> On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Okey dokey... the idea is a T&R on Thurs with a release next >> Mon/Tues. >>>> >>>>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Let's shoot for a T&R next week. The work will keep me warm :) >>> >>> <RE Time for 2.4.11.msg> >
