Hmmm:

    svn diff https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.11 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.12 | cdiff

shows nothing that would account for this behavior, afaict.

> On Jan 25, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote:
> 
> On 25/01/2015 17:21, Nick Edwards wrote:
> 
>> I am noticing a number of hits using UTC with this version?
>> Not all, only some, is anyone else seeing this?
>> Does not occur on 2.4.10.
>> They are php pages, however, the main site which is php is static, it
>> only uses php for counter nothing else, its all hard written in vi.
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/23/15, Jim Jagielski <
>> j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.12 can be found at the 
>>> usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on 
>>> releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.12 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ 
>>> ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. 
>>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience. Thx!
>  
> Hrmm, I also see this,
> 
>  
> 170.130.179.246 - - [26/Jan/2015:01:02:06 +0000] "GET /archives/
> 197.156.95.99 - - [26/Jan/2015:11:02:18 +1000] "GET /ups/t568b.png HTTP/1.1" 
> 95.211.138.225 - - [26/Jan/2015:01:02:40 +0000] "GET /Android-Apps.html 
> HTTP/1.1" 
> 144.76.247.107 - - [26/Jan/2015:11:03:32 +1000] "GET /
> 
> 
> (correct time is 11:xx:xx)
> 
> My first thought was php - it's been known in the past to be this type of 
> offender however I have timezone set in the ini, not to mention I've been 
> running 5.5.20 since its release and going back a few weeks in master logs I 
> see it only occurring since 2.4.12  was installed and I also see it on other 
> sites, one of which is written in ruby, and a static HTML site, so that rules 
> out php at fault (for once LOL), since only one box (my private one) is 
> running 2.4.12, I checked a few other servers on 2.4.10 and can see no sign 
> of this UTC logging.
> 
> So, until I have time to look further I withdraw my N/B "Good to go"
> 
>  

Reply via email to