Hi, On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Federico Mennite <[email protected]> wrote: > a few days ago I've submitted the bugreport below > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
I made a reply there. > Questions: > - Why weren't such a large number of semaphores and shared memory segments > required for mod_balancer to run in apacche 2.2? The difference in 2.4 is the (dynamic) balancer manager which requires each vhost to have its own shm/sem. > - am I right in stating that the current code in apache 2.4 seems to > allocate a lot more resources than really needed? Probably not if you configure the balancers in the vhosts they are used only (see [1]). > - are my behavioral "conclusions" close enough to what the setup code of > mod_balancer is currently doing? They seem correct should the balancers be configured globally, which is not how it should be done in 2.4. Each vhost should declare the balancers it uses (ProxyPass) only, and mod_macro can help do things in the global section (if that matters). Regards, Yann. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/users%40httpd.apache.org/msg57501.html
