:)
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> OTOH it makes it clear that the keepalive timeout belongs to the
>> IP:port the request was received on, and not to the server for which
>> the latest request was handled on that IP:port.
>
>
> I think I documented the behavior, but just to get it on the books.
> What you say above is definitely the rationalization, but I think if
> we can remember the last servers keepalivetimeout (migration problems
> aside) I think it is better to use it.
