On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mar 26, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That is certainly less code then Ed's proof of concept -- how >> uncharacteristic of you :) >> > > LOL!
Yes, I know, was not in great shape, but if I had known Ed was ahead, I certainly would have shown my full potential :) That said, I'm not sure how I should take this, warning, advice, kind sarcasm, both? I'm very open to suggestions/blame when I over/shouldn't commit things, and won't be offended if a revert or another-way-to-do-it is asked (any pointer?). I also prefer oneliners when applicable, for sure (less work/surprise), but sometimes things need to be be fixed completely (and/or evolutively), at least in trunk. It also appears that trunk and 2.4 should be kept in sync as much as possible, that's kind of paradox which sometimes may lead to half fixes/improvements. Maybe I tend to fix and evolve (the related) too much at the same time, or else I just overdo everything (I try hard not to, though)... There are yet several "multi-liners" proposals which were not acked, or lost, although fixing real issues (IMHO). I commited some of them already (I guess you noticed these), and would like to the same for the others ( I'll ping on the corresponding threads first ;) So don't hesitate to ring the bell, no offense, that's how it works!
