Hmmm.. missed a patch.
r1670434
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> Hmmm... let me double check.
>
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/31/2015 08:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> They are used by mod_spdy and/or mod_h2..., iirc
>>
>> They use private structures of mod_ssl directly? That does not sound like a
>> good idea.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rüdiger
>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/31/2015 07:12 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>> Author: jim
>>>>> Date: Tue Mar 31 17:12:51 2015
>>>>> New Revision: 1670397
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1670397
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> ALPN support, based on mod_spdy/mod_h2 patch set
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c
>>>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.h
>>>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c
>>>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_io.c
>>>>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_private.h
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if I miss the obvious, but where do we use
>>>>
>>>> ssl_alpn_pref
>>>> alpn_proposefns
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> I can only see that we set it, but I fail to see where it is used.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Rüdiger
>>>
>>>
>
