On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > But is there real 2.2.x user with OpenSSL < 0.9.8a? > > I'm no expert (we use a proprietary toolkit and SSL module where I > spend most of my time), but that seems like quite an extreme thing to > preserve in 2.2.x. Maybe worth a separate thread though to shake out > anyone with a stake in preserving it. > Agreed. Wouldn't a ./configure time warning suffice? I also disagree with disabling 0.9.7 entirely on a legacy branch.
