On 10/05/2015 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.05.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Noel Butler: > >> Either way, using slackware on all my servers its trivial since the >> distro keeps pretty much up to date by design - unlike RH/debian and >> their kiddy versions who bring out new releases with 2+yo libs and other >> goodies, I'd just hesitate to drop them, wait and see whats capable in >> their current enterprise releases when the time comes to make that >> decision, since RH is most used enterprise release, I'm going to >> contradict myself here - since it's always been my belief that upstreams >> should never base their decisions on downstreams (like ASF does WRT >> deprecating 2.2) but if RH for example's new release at the time doesn't >> support 1.2, its pointless dropping 1.0/1.1 > > Redhat already supports 1.2, not only thew new RHEL7, also up-to-date RHEL6, > only RHEL5 which is still supported is behind and that's just because that's > the whole purpose of a LTS distribution Thats good to know, thanks you. Can any SUSE and debian users confirm the current supported stable release supports 1.2? If so, then by objection is withdrawn Bill :)
