I had thought that we decided NOT to make that change for 2.4.x since it would affect anyone who persisted balancer changes when they upgraded...
> On May 18, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 23.01.2015 um 11:09 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Author: jim >>>> Date: Mon Oct 27 12:40:34 2014 >>>> New Revision: 1634520 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1634520 >>>> Log: >>>> Merge r1621367, r1621372, r1625952 from trunk: >>>> >>>> PR53218 >>>> Allow for longer worker names and make truncation a non-fatal >>>> error... >>>> >>>> >>>> Correct loglevel. >>>> >>>> >>>> oops... prepend 0 >>>> >>>> Reviewed/backported by: jim >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ (props changed) >>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES >>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml (props >>>> changed) >>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c >>>> >>> >>> The "modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h" part of r1621367 was not merge here, ie : >>> >>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (original) >>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h Fri Aug 29 19:17:45 2014 >>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ PROXY_WORKER_DISABLED | PROXY_WORKER_STO >>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_SCHEME_SIZE 16 >>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_ROUTE_SIZE 96 >>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_ROUTE_SIZE 64 >>> -#define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 96 >>> +#define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 192 >>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 64 >>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_HOSTNAME_SIZE 96 >>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_HOSTNAME_SIZE 64 >>> >>> So the worker name is still 96 bytes (max) in 2.4.x. >> >> >> This hasn't changed yet. > > Jim, ping?
