On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:56 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Fri May 22 06:56:04 2015
>> New Revision: 1681006
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1681006
>> Log:
>>
>>   Vote up one patch, presume lazy concensus on second patch (platform 
>> specific
>>   with two affirmative reviewers)
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1681006&r1=1681005&r2=1681006&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Fri May 22 06:56:04 2015
>> @@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>>  PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>>    [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
>>
>> +   * mod_proxy: use the original (non absolute) form of the request-line's 
>> URI
>> +     for requests embedded in CONNECT payloads used to connect SSL backends 
>> via
>> +     a ProxyRemote forward-proxy. PR 55892.
>> +     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1665215
>> +                  http://svn.apache.org/r1665218 (CHANGES entry)
>> +     2.2.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES)
>> +     +1: ylavic, wrowe
>
> I guess this is the wrong lazy concensus...

Adjusted in r1681024.

Reply via email to