On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> Anyone else think it's time to EOL 2.2 and focus >> on 2.4 and the next gen? My thoughts are that http/2 >> and mod_h2 will drive the trunk design efforts and so >> it would be nice to focus energy on 2.4 and later... > > > People here focus their energy on whatever they want. It takes a small > number of people to keep a stable branch going (technically 3, but in > practice a slightly higher number). Instead of the group choosing EOL or > only-security-fixes-of-some-minimal-severity or something else for a stable > branch based on what many people think is interesting to them for whatever > reason, I think that the project should limit its concern to ensuring that > the community understands the state of the branch and that it is EOL-ed when > a sufficient number of people don't care. > > What we need to know for the 2.2.x branch is basically this: > > Developers (committers or not): > > [ ] I am willing to help resolve security issues in the 2.2.x branch. > [ ] I am willing to help address non-security issues in the 2.2.x branch. > > PMC members: > > [ ] I am willing to test and vote on proposed 2.2.x releases.
Looks a sensible approach to me. BTW, I'll/d check all ;)
