Hi Rainer, On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:06 PM, <rj...@apache.org> wrote: > @@ -232,14 +238,14 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1681694 > 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) > +1: ylavic > + rjung: Would it makes sense to handle 500/503 for the other proxy > + protocols similar? I see error_override at least also in the > + AJP and FCGI case.
I'll have a look at these, looks consitent to do it there too. > + rjung: What about setting the note proxy-error-override in general > + if an error override happens so it might get more uses in > + the future. Would that make sense? I'm not sure to understand here, what would be a "general" way to set the note? It seems to me that each (proxy) module only can tell whether the error comes from itself or the backend.
