In some cases, perhaps, but this was objection asked-and-answered so my -1 was void.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, <wr...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: wrowe > > Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015 > > New Revision: 1686248 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248 > > Log: > > After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :) > > > > Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant comments/votes. > > It seems to me that since a -1 needs to be argued, it can't be deleted > without.. >
