Ignore my last post - presumably UDS is short for UNIX-domain socket! If we are going down a plugable protocol route, that I'd like to see the option to use something a lot more complicated that a socket - e.g. a connection to a remote SSHD / socket forward via libssh or similar.
Phil On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Phil Lello <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you mean UDP, or do I need to add UDS to my research list? > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, right now httpd (in 2.4) can proxy over UDS... I have >> been thinking about adding UDS support to Listen as well. >> >> > On Jul 18, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Phil Lello <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'm looking at patching httpd/libapr to support non-TCP transports. >> > >> > Specifically, the transports I'd like add are: >> > >> > - UNIX-domain sockets >> > - File-system pipes (and pipe-like devices - e.g. serial ports) >> > >> > Would there be interest in adding these to core? >> > >> > Phil >> >> >
