http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c?revision=1680916&view=markup
Line 80
static const unsigned char dh1024_p[] = {
is in an #if 0
Line 113
is not
static const unsigned char dh1024_p[] = {
ssl_engine_dh.c:123:28: error: redefinition of 'dh1024_p' with a
different type: 'const unsigned char []' vs 'unsigned char [128]'
static const unsigned char dh1024_p[] = {
^
ssl_engine_dh.c:84:22: note: previous definition is here
static unsigned char dh1024_p[] = {
unless their patch screwed it up like you were speculating, could the
freebsd preprocessor be picky?
Andy
On 07/20/2015 01:59 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Hmm, I don't see the line numbers of ssl_engine_dh.c in the the log matching
with the ones of 2.2.31.
And the log says somewhere above:
Applying FreeBSD patches for apache22-2.2.31
Maybe a faulty patch to ssl_engine_dh.c that changed the DH code for FreeBSD
before 2.2.31?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 07/20/2015 06:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Someone reported that 2.2.31 (w/ mod_ssl) doesn't build under FreeBSD 10:
https://feld.me/freebsd/apache22-2.2.31.log
I will try it out and see.
