> On Aug 26, 2015, at 1:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > Ideally, getting mod_h2 into users hands will be MUCH easier by focusing > on finishing up the 2.4 backporting... This "out of the blue" notice > to alpha 2.5 seems to me some method to "stall" or circumvent action in that > direction by changing the goalposts... > > If everyone is on the same page about our versioning contract with module > authors, the backport thumbs up-or-down decision is going to be clear cut to > all of us, right? > > -0.9 > > Thank you for your notice of intent to vote against a release, I appreciate > the heads-up. Releases cannot be vetoed, of course. > > The faster early adopters can get us bug feedback, the faster the stable and > tested module can be backported to 2.4 without "experimental" warnings, IMO.
You do know, of course, that the module WAS designed WITH 2.4 IN MIND... That is, the module was created to add http/2 to 2.4.
