On 08/27/2015 08:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Author: jkaluza > Date: Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015 > New Revision: 1698084 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698084 > Log: > Vote > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1698084&r1=1698083&r2=1698084&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Aug 27 06:57:08 2015 > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > None, only 2.2.x specific > Backport version for 2.2.x of patch: > http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/pr58267.diff > - +1: rpluem, > + +1: rpluem, jkaluza > > > PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED > > >
I know that I saw positive feedback or better +1's on the dev list and that this counts as well, but to ease documentation and to be sure that we all talked about the same I would like to see these +1's going in STATUS if they are still valid. I have Yann and Jim on my mind :-). Regards Rüdiger
