On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]> wrote: > > should r1629916 also be included? > The changelog says that it is a follow up to r1629909, which is included in > the patch below.
My bad, I forgot to include it in the backport proposal/patch (this is harmless though). Follow up proposed in r1705614.
