On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today. > > > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > > > > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum <m...@toftum.dk> wrote: > > > >> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module > >> does (avoid confusion with H2 database) and because that's how other > >> protocol modules like mod_http and mod_ftp are named. > > > > +1. > +0.9, I found the mod_h2 module name really charming, but this is more descriptive.
