On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de > wrote:
> Well, it is used only in one INFO log statement on startup... > > There are now several people who participated in early trials if mod_h2 > and gave really useful feedback and found bugs. Without a version number of > the module being visible in the log somewhere, it would make this kind of > tests much more difficult. > > While the module is experimental, I'd like to continue giving the > adventurous types early experience versions. That way we can gather useful > feedback between release cycles. > Cool, thanks... (I guess they'll get a patch to put over 2.4.17, and the patch will have a modified version.) > > Once we leave the experimental mode and merge all tighter to the core, > this version number becomes meaningless and should go. > > //Stefan > > > Am 08.10.2015 um 13:59 schrieb Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>: > > > > Can we get rid of this? The only meaningful version is the httpd > version. (I guess mod_ssl still pretends to have a meaningful version > number.) > > > > I could see a potential use of a separate version number in the very > short term to indicate API breakages in this "experimental" component that > we couldn't with an MMN Major change, but then the version number has to be > updated following certain rules and the purpose has to be well described to > module authors, and module authors mucking with internals of this should be > following httpd dev closely anyway, at least until it is not experimental. > > > > -- > > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > > http://emptyhammock.com/ > > > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
