[Meant for dev@...] Thoughts?
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58503 > > --- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> --- > (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #7) >> Actually I think mod_proxy_wstunnel falls into the same pitfall >> mod_proxy_http was in and it needs to do the same / something similar then >> mod_proxy_http.c with >> >> proxy_buckets_lifetime_transform > > Yes I agree, just proposed a quick patch to determine whether it came from > mod_proxy_wstunnel or some failure in the core deferred/pipelined write > logic... > > We need to either use lifetime_transform like in proxy_http, or I was thinking > of modifying all the input filters that create their buckets on f->r/c's > pool/bucket_alloc so that they now use their given bb->p and bb->bucket_alloc. > > By doing the latter, we wouldn't have to transform the lifetime, it would be > determined by the caller...
