> On Nov 23, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > 1 typo below. > > Moreover, this kind of patch is a good candidate for backport as it > introduces many small differences between 2.4 and trunk. > Without a backport, backporting future patches may become a nightmare. >
++1. I always anticipated it being backported.
