> On Nov 23, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 1 typo below.
> 
> Moreover, this kind of patch is a good candidate for backport as it 
> introduces many small differences between 2.4 and trunk.
> Without a backport, backporting future patches may become a nightmare.
> 

++1. I always anticipated it being backported.

Reply via email to