On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:13 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The 100-continue case isn't a particular one IMHO, any Upgrade header >> would be informative, not authoritative (not a 101 status). > > Not sure what you mean. If an Upgrade: request is recieved and declined, > you are right, there is no 101-switching protocols, just the typical > http/1.1 > response following any 100-continue negotiated request body.
I mean if httpd honors a 100-continue, it has to be done before the 101 Switching Protocols, either in the http_filter (like currently), or if the request is proxyed and we implement end-to-end 100-continue (I'm working on this), by forwarding the backend's 100-continue. Then we can upgrade with 101 for the real response. It's not different than a normal request with a body and no 100-continue expection IMHO.
