> On Dec 8, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/08/2015 12:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Well.... >> >> We are not NGINX. We are also not Microsoft. We don't create HTTP >> response codes willy-nilly. We actually try to *honor* the actual >> specs. > > Yes, I agree 100%. :) Trust me, I've dealt with enough non-standard HTTP > "extensions"; I'm not suggesting we just start doing stuff willy-nilly. > > There are people who have worked on those specs on this mailing list, though, > who might be interested in making official improvements and additions -- or > have opinions on why those additions would not actually be improvements. This > seemed like a nice place to talk about it, since we have implementation > experts who can weigh in. If that's not on topic, I can try to take it > somewhere else. >
I agree that adding in some of the http/2 lists on this thread would make sense.
