As an alternative, we can flag removing pre openssl 1.0.1 support as a showstopper in STATUS and leave it be for a while longer to make backports a bit easier. Thoughts? On Dec 14, 2015 12:35, "Ruediger Pluem" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 12/14/2015 07:15 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > W.r.t. http://svn.apache.org/r1719967 - I'm +1 for the backport. > > I'd like to propose we remove all support from *trunk* for OpenSSL < > 1.0.1 > > effective now... > > > > > https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2014-December/000000.html > > > > We don't deprecate support on maintenance branches (e.g. 2.2/2.4), > > because we seek to minimize the pain of moving from one subversion > > release to another. If someone wanted to hack a non-fatal warning for > > the ./configure phase, that could be a worthwhile patch. > > > > > > +1 > > Regards > > Rüdiger >
